jackos wrote: Mindo wrote:
Getting Harvey to field questions from irate fans = LUST in bed with Harvey?
I've asked lots of people lots of questions in my lifetime. I've only slept with a very small proportion of them
Oh give over. LUST didn't 'get' Harvey to do anything. He is there for one reason, n that is the takeover n the new role he expects to have at the club. The only thing that has changed is the name of the person paying Harvey's cheques.
If Harvey looking after his own interests has the consequence of greater fan engagement, then that is a good thing. Before = Harvey's a scumbag, club ignores or insults fans. Afterwards = Harvey's a scumbag, but the club are at least appearing to listen to the fans. Positive, no?
You need to live in the real world. We dont get to appoint the chief executive.
I've previously said that, as far as Im concerned, LUST have no decisive role to play in any takeover. But twat stewards is exactly the kind of issue that they should, and can, improve by raising it with representatives from the club (whoever they are)
I'll take you out for a meal with Mr and Mrs. Pain, order up some violent quiche