EUROSCEPTICS

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Leeds0269 » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:00 pm

Mustafaster wrote:Brits living in Europe discussing ....errr.... Britain's place in Europe. :elephant:
I can see how you might reckon it's ironic.
Cunt.


I'll explain in simple terms; this thread is about Britain's role in europe and the effects on Britain. As an expat, it doesnt affect you anywhere near as much as someone who actually lives here still.

It's ironic that the people most interested and making most comments on this subject are the ones that dont live here anymore and arent effected anywhere near as much. I.e. The Brits who live here dont seem that arsed. Hence, it's ironic.

Got that you fucking thick cunt?
Been away from posting for too long, but still been lingering around like a bad fart.
User avatar
Leeds0269
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:50 pm

EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Ontolly » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:04 pm

The ironic thing is that it's Americans who - I can't be fucking bothered
A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.
User avatar
Ontolly
 
Posts: 2315
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:36 pm
Location: Worcester

EUROSCEPTICS

Postby jackos » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:17 pm

Leeds0269 wrote:
Mustafaster wrote:Brits living in Europe discussing ....errr.... Britain's place in Europe. :elephant:
I can see how you might reckon it's ironic.
Cunt.


I'll explain in simple terms; this thread is about Britain's role in europe and the effects on Britain. As an expat, it doesnt affect you anywhere near as much as someone who actually lives here still.

It's ironic that the people most interested and making most comments on this subject are the ones that dont live here anymore and arent effected anywhere near as much. I.e. The Brits who live here dont seem that arsed. Hence, it's ironic.

Got that you fucking thick cunt?


May I suggest you find yrself a bog role n have a wank? Silly cunt.
User avatar
jackos
 
Posts: 6218
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Mustafaster » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:46 pm

I have the answer to the Euro crisis.
Just got an email from Wonga telling me how I can wipe out 70% of my debt!
Gonna forward it to Merkozy.
Sorted! :cheers:
I was correct!
User avatar
Mustafaster
 
Posts: 4660
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 am
Location: PC Brigade House.

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby AndyPaul » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:03 am

I really haven't got a clue about anything anyone is saying on his thread.

I guess the summary is we are fucked? Yes? Whatever happens?
User avatar
AndyPaul
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:27 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby burnleyinexile » Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:36 am

As my rather hazy memories of the referendum go, I recall that the EC was about trade...end of. No mention of the Euro, one Army, one Police, a court that over-ruled sovereign courts, and a distant government that seems a million miles away from those it purports to represent, and makes Parliament look like a bastion of virtue and self restraint. It costs us billions every year, yet we seem to get little in return. As for giving us a market, surely if they want/need our goods they will still buy them, regardless of our being in the club or not?

Be interesting to see what happens now, since cameron has pissed off the French, what happens to the defence pact he signed with them last year. They are a petulant self serving grudge bearing set of onion wearing wine drinking tits who are sullen and sulky at the best of times. How are they going to react when, after the argies supported by the yanks, invade the Falklands and we ask if we can borrow their aircraft carrier (Mr Cameron, that is a warship that carries military aircraft). They'll tell us it's broken or something.

What would be the impact if we pulled out of the EC/EU/Common Market?
"Those who have long enjoyed such privileges as we enjoy forget in time that men have died to win them"

“We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.”
User avatar
burnleyinexile
 
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Take a wild guess

EUROSCEPTICS

Postby jackos » Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:41 am

AndyPaul wrote:I guess the summary is we are fucked? Yes? Whatever happens?


I don't think so, its like pig flu, bird flu, or whatever the fuck flu, papers get hysterical, but it makes no fucking difference at all to the majority of us. We get on with our lives, so what if y can't afford a new car this year, the majority of us will still be able to put food on our kids plates. We had next to fuck all when I grew up, got food parcels from the church at Xmas, Mum ( God bless her ) managed. That's what people do, they cope.

Fuck the politicians, the banks, the press, fuck hm all. Let them play their games.
User avatar
jackos
 
Posts: 6218
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

EUROSCEPTICS

Postby jackos » Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:47 am

burnleyinexile wrote: What would be the impact if we pulled out of the EC/EU/Common Market?


Well loads of shit I suppose, a couple of hundred thousand Brits being fucked off back to the UK after their work permits expired I guess. N a rather large exodus of companies moving production to counties in the inner market.

Hopefully it wont mean Georgette Hill gets to #1 though, :D
User avatar
jackos
 
Posts: 6218
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby WHITETHROUGH » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:05 am

WHITETHROUGH wrote:
Do I think Cameron will deliver much......nope not really because he is a spineless fucker, though I would love him to prove me wrong?


I have woke up this morning to find Cameron has fallen out with the French and used his 'veto' to block an agreement with the 'twenty seven' ......... I did not think he would do that, I am quite frankly shocked. I am not sure what the future is for the Euro or what Europe will morph in to, but I don't see our future being a member of the EU.
Ex-Servicemen dont die,they go to hell and re-group


For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck 'im out, the brute!"

But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;


Surrender is for wimps,I vote we die!
WHITETHROUGH
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: Nr Pontefract

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Dale White » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:15 am

With Cameron you always have to suspect he puts himsen first and everything else second. i agree we should never be in the euro but it doesn't do any good to piss them off either, especially when so many jobs are locked in to trade with europe.
FUCK OFF BATES !!!
User avatar
Dale White
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Rochdale

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby jackos » Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:44 am

WHITETHROUGH wrote: I have woke up this morning to find Cameron has fallen out with the French and used his 'veto' to block an agreement with the 'twenty seven' ......... I did not think he would do that, I am quite frankly shocked. I am not sure what the future is for the Euro or what Europe will morph in to, but I don't see our future being a member of the EU.


Cameron n Pál Schmitt :D What a pair, he's in good company there! I wouldn't be surprised if Sweden joins that duo, the right wing government here don't have a majority so they'll probably struggle to force the deal through, especially when the socialists are struggling with poor ratings, there's plenty of points to be won by EU bashing.

Can the UK can realistically leave the single market though? Countries all over the Globe are forming these clubs, what would The UK gain by isolating itself? It would be a populist move made for short term political points wouldn't it? It'd most certainly lead to the break up of the UK, why would the Scots stay in the UK? Better they leave England to it in join the EU surely? I really don't understand the arguments for leaving completely. France and Germany are going to do their thing, and they'll take most of their EURO mates with them, they really have very little choice. Sweden definitely isn't going to even consider joining the Euro this decade, I suppose the same goes for all the countries who stayed out at the start, but I don't think there's a likelihood of any Countries leaving the EU completely.
User avatar
jackos
 
Posts: 6218
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby eric olthwaite » Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:24 am

jackos wrote:Can the UK can realistically leave the single market though?


As I understand it, it'd be plausible to leave the EU without leaving the single market - ie this. The Merkozy wouldn't like it, I'm sure, and it may not benefit the existing EFTA members to suddenly have a vast economy join them, but it's got to be worth considering.
User avatar
eric olthwaite
 
Posts: 8787
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Dale White » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:52 am

Cameron, i say old bean we're having a spot of bother with the Argies again can we borrow your carrier, Sarkozy, get fucked posh boy. :thumbl:
FUCK OFF BATES !!!
User avatar
Dale White
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Rochdale

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby stugats » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:28 pm

burnleyinexile wrote:As my rather hazy memories of the referendum go, I recall that the EC was about trade...end of. No mention of the Euro, one Army, one Police, a court that over-ruled sovereign courts, and a distant government that seems a million miles away from those it purports to represent, and makes Parliament look like a bastion of virtue and self restraint. It costs us billions every year, yet we seem to get little in return. As for giving us a market, surely if they want/need our goods they will still buy them, regardless of our being in the club or not?

Be interesting to see what happens now, since cameron has pissed off the French, what happens to the defence pact he signed with them last year. They are a petulant self serving grudge bearing set of onion wearing wine drinking tits who are sullen and sulky at the best of times. How are they going to react when, after the argies supported by the yanks, invade the Falklands and we ask if we can borrow their aircraft carrier (Mr Cameron, that is a warship that carries military aircraft). They'll tell us it's broken or something.




What would be the impact if we pulled out of the EC/EU/Common Market?



:mrgreen: why don't you say what you really mean burnley :mrgreen:
stand down Kenny stand down please stand down Kenny


Anyone who cannot manage a take-over isn't going to be able to manage the club. Time to fuck these attention seeking no mark amatures off.




chill winston
User avatar
stugats
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Freecloud Mountain

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby burnleyinexile » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:42 pm

stugats wrote:
burnleyinexile wrote:As my rather hazy memories of the referendum go, I recall that the EC was about trade...end of. No mention of the Euro, one Army, one Police, a court that over-ruled sovereign courts, and a distant government that seems a million miles away from those it purports to represent, and makes Parliament look like a bastion of virtue and self restraint. It costs us billions every year, yet we seem to get little in return. As for giving us a market, surely if they want/need our goods they will still buy them, regardless of our being in the club or not?

Be interesting to see what happens now, since cameron has pissed off the French, what happens to the defence pact he signed with them last year. They are a petulant self serving grudge bearing set of onion wearing wine drinking tits who are sullen and sulky at the best of times. How are they going to react when, after the argies supported by the yanks, invade the Falklands and we ask if we can borrow their aircraft carrier (Mr Cameron, that is a warship that carries military aircraft). They'll tell us it's broken or something.




What would be the impact if we pulled out of the EC/EU/Common Market?



:mrgreen: why don't you say what you really mean burnley :mrgreen:



:mrgreen: Cos I'm shy and retiring, I thought you'd know that by now. :lol:
"Those who have long enjoyed such privileges as we enjoy forget in time that men have died to win them"

“We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.”
User avatar
burnleyinexile
 
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Take a wild guess

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Rob » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:47 pm

Having lived in Brussels for six years, I have seen at first hand the quite unbelievable waste and fiddling that goes on. It's not a right wing UK media myth. This, in addition to the European political institutions being a dumping ground for failed national politicians, puts me firmly in the Eurosceptic camp. With the seemingly never ending committees, nowt will ever get done.

Yes, by all means let us be part of a Eurpean free trade area but that's it. The world has now changed dramatically even over the past ten years and we interact so much more with countries all around the world I can't see it's in our best interests to be ever more closely locked into a grossly inefficient European political and fiscal system.

The Euro may well become a two tier system with the Latinate countries getting the boot.
Rob
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:59 am
Location: South Florida

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Son of Leeds » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:51 pm

From The Economist:

The 23 members of the new pact, if they act as a block, can outvote Britain. They are divided among themselves, of course. But their habit of working together and cutting deals will, inevitably, begin to weigh against Britain over time.

Britain may assume it will benefit from extra business for the City, should the euro zone ever pass a financial-transaction tax. But what if the new club starts imposing financial regulations among the 17 euro-zone members, or the 23 members of the euro-plus pact? That could begin to force euro-denominated transactions into the euro zone, say Paris or Frankfurt. Britain would, surely, have had more influence had the countries of the euro zone remained under an EU-wide system.

It says much about the dire state of the debate on Europe within Britain's Conservative party that, as Mr Cameron set out to Brussels, another Tory MP portentously invoked the memory of Neville Chamberlain, who infamously came back from Munich with empty assurances from Adolf Hitler. Mr Cameron may have made a grievous mistake with regard to Britain's long-term interest. But at least nobody can accuse him of returning from Brussels with a piece of paper in his hand.


Doesn't look that good for Britain at the moment. I live partly in the UK and partly in France - when I can get my onion suit on - and my impression has always been that in general, and in the Conservative Party in particular, discussion about Europe in this country has been more emotional than thoughtful.

I reckon it's back to McCormack and Keogh tomorrow, with Pugh and Clayton in centre mid', Snodgrass left and Sam on the right. We seem to have run out of centre midfielders just when 4-5-1 looked the ticket. Any chance of Snods, Pugh and Clayton in a midfield three with Lucy joining the other two strikers?

Any chance for
'What terrible marking from Tottenham!'
Son of Leeds
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Man Called Sun » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:07 pm

Son of Leeds wrote:Doesn't look that good for Britain at the moment. I live partly in the UK and partly in France - when I can get my onion suit on - and my impression has always been that in general, and in the Conservative Party in particular, discussion about Europe in this country has been more emotional than thoughtful.

I reckon it's back to McCormack and Keogh tomorrow, with Pugh and Clayton in centre mid', Snodgrass left and Sam on the right. We seem to have run out of centre midfielders just when 4-5-1 looked the ticket. Any chance of Snods, Pugh and Clayton in a midfield three with Lucy joining the other two strikers?

Any chance for

I'm assuming this mid-sentence cut off is an homage to the ending of The Dice Man?
User avatar
Man Called Sun
 
Posts: 2263
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:26 am
Location: Nottingham

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby Mustafaster » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:26 pm

Son of Leeds wrote:From The Economist:

The 23 members of the new pact, if they act as a block, can outvote Britain. They are divided among themselves, of course. But their habit of working together and cutting deals will, inevitably, begin to weigh against Britain over time.

Britain may assume it will benefit from extra business for the City, should the euro zone ever pass a financial-transaction tax. But what if the new club starts imposing financial regulations among the 17 euro-zone members, or the 23 members of the euro-plus pact? That could begin to force euro-denominated transactions into the euro zone, say Paris or Frankfurt. Britain would, surely, have had more influence had the countries of the euro zone remained under an EU-wide system.

It says much about the dire state of the debate on Europe within Britain's Conservative party that, as Mr Cameron set out to Brussels, another Tory MP portentously invoked the memory of Neville Chamberlain, who infamously came back from Munich with empty assurances from Adolf Hitler. Mr Cameron may have made a grievous mistake with regard to Britain's long-term interest. But at least nobody can accuse him of returning from Brussels with a piece of paper in his hand.


Doesn't look that good for Britain at the moment. I live partly in the UK and partly in France - when I can get my onion suit on - and my impression has always been that in general, and in the Conservative Party in particular, discussion about Europe in this country has been more emotional than thoughtful.

I reckon it's back to McCormack and Keogh tomorrow, with Pugh and Clayton in centre mid', Snodgrass left and Sam on the right. We seem to have run out of centre midfielders just when 4-5-1 looked the ticket. Any chance of Snods, Pugh and Clayton in a midfield three with Lucy joining the other two strikers?

Any chance for

Aye. Cameron has gone in to bat for the Canary Wharf, not for Britain.
The only reasons for using the veto were to keep his old school chums in the City happy and to appease the Little Englanders in his own party.
Neither will work imo.
Europe is mightily, but mightily pissed off at the UK right now, and it's never a good idea to piss your neighbours and business partners off unless you have a very strong hand. The UK doesn't, UK debt levels are as bad as everybody else's, worse in a lot of cases. The markets will come sharking after sterling sooner or later, and the UK is gonna need all the friends it can get.
The Little Englanders wont't be fobbed off with this either, they've got a taste of blood and they'll be back for more sooner rather than later as well.

Time for Nunez to step up and make a name for himself as a swap option.
Snods, Pugh Clayton, Sam as a 4 man mid with Nunez behind Becchio.
I was correct!
User avatar
Mustafaster
 
Posts: 4660
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 am
Location: PC Brigade House.

Re: EUROSCEPTICS

Postby gazurtoids » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:30 pm

Unpleasant as it may be, when the City represents such a large fraction of British GDP, does Cameron have any choice but to defend it?

I'd support a Tobin tax, personally, but I can understand that it would put London at a disadvantage compared to New York and the like, and so why the British government is reluctant to endorse it without a worldwide implementation.

Have I missed something?

McCormack behind Becchio for me. Keogh to come on and perform the same job he did vs Millwall if needed.
User avatar
gazurtoids
 
Posts: 6735
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:10 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Square Ball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mr Reality and 12 guests