We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby BARE-NAKED-LADY » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:26 am

Top Cat Cooper wrote:My take on the "bigger picture" is this, I was happy with SG and didnt want him to leave/get sacked, I thought he was just the right up and coming young manager we needed and both he and the team would continue to develop and improve and we would gain promotion to the prem in two/three seasons after winning promotion to the Championship. There were ominus signs though in League 1 when we almost fucked it up after being comfortable for so long and made it by a whisker but I still expected us to go on to consolidate and improve in the Championship.

However, the reason I felt it was time for a change of manager was as has already been pointed out many times, SG's career was as a CB yet he has failed in three years to sort out the defence, not 9 games 3 years, plus despite Bates I don't think his dealings in the transfer market were very good, yes I know we were only able to bring in either cheap transfers or loanees, but how many players did we go through during his tenure and how many actually turned out to be decent or shrewd signings that in a lot of cases ended up on the bench and were hardly used, Webber is now another example under Warnock. I know your response to this will be to blame Bates, but I think this is why he stopped backing SG and even allowing for Bates cheap transfers and loanees I think SG could have been a bit shrewder in the market, assuming it was him making the signings which we may never know.

So, with results and performances deteriorating and no end in sight to our defensive problems I honestly thought SG had taken us as far as he could and it was time for a change and was pleased when Colin signed for no other reason than his track record in taking teams up from this division. Also, I quite like his no nonsense approach which if we want any chance at all of changing Bates transfer policy then he is the manager to do it but I am under no illusions about his style of football and agree with whats been said that we played better football on the ground under SG but only in patches, whether his current style will continue remains to be seen, but like I said in an earlier post West Ham fans for all their moaning will take promotion if it comes and am sure we will be no different.

As has been mentioned it's a thin line between winning and losing, we could so easily have won the Southampton and West Ham games and we almost gained a point here with 10 men so 7 points would have made all the difference but you don't always get what you deserve in football either by winning or losing. The disappointing results/performances under Colin have been Forest and Watford, apart from that at the time of playing we have played 5 out of the top 6 teams so it was always going to be a difficult period but you can put whatever spin you want on it to suit your argument. I was just pleased to see a Leeds team go out and play for the shirt which I thought was lacking under SG and no I am not saying that tackles like Pugh's and Thompsons are acceptable or that is the way I want to see my team play, just that they at least put a shift in and want to play for this great club and show it in their performances. If Colin gets us in the top two next season with boring football I will settle for that as a compromise, if he doesen't, then that is the time to judge him imo not after 9 games, in the meantime I just want to try and be as positive as a glass half full will allow and get behind the new manager and the team and see where it takes us MOT

Am sure I have a tin hat round here somewhere........


Only had a chance to checked this thread out and I haven't seen so many disagreements about the current team, manager and previous manager for...well..for years really. Are things that bad? Has the acceptance of how shit we really are affected our constructive posts on Leeds?

I think it has, and after I witnessed that terrible defeat against Watford last week, I can understand why. However, I actually agree with everything TCC has written above.

I have been to every home match this season (except 2) and a few away matches and as TC has pointed out above, we never sustained any consistency in a full 90 minute good performance under Grayson. The only match that we played well in for 90 minutes was against Hull if I can recall, so the signs were there for all to see way before he was as sacked.I will hold my opinion on Warnock (whom I am not a big fan of) until next season.

I can't really judge him until them- sorry.

As for him tearing a strip off Thompson in public, I must be the only one who thinks that he didn't. I think he said something along the lines of "You were a bit rash lad, it was a stupid tackle, but you'll learn from this, now get yourself in the shower and back out here..." Something along those lines anyway....
B-N-L
BARE-NAKED-LADY
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby BARE-NAKED-LADY » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:27 am

Quiffy wrote:my twopenneth, for what it's worth is that colin is probably the right man for now. i quite enjoyed the backs against the wall tough tackling of the reading game. most new managers can't suddenly change the way the players play, but they can change the attitude of those players and it was good to see they really didn't want to lose when the odds were massively stacked against them. after thompson's departure we were 11/1 or 14/1 to win and i thought we had a chance of sneaking it until their late goals, which is better than what i was expecting after 15 minutes.. personally i don't think we'd have seen such a battling performance under grayson. i don't think grayson is a bad manager at all, but something seemed to have gone wrong off the pitch, which together with the sale of our best players meant he was unfortunately a lame duck.

we've still got he same players as under grayson, so i don't see how we can expect consistently better performances though there have been signs that, like under grayson, we can perform better sometimes. the problem is consistency, a problem that almost all the division seems to have. we're not alone in that.

we're rightly midtable, but it seems every now and then, in the right light the wrinkles and flab don't show and we can still look half decent.

and why's colin the right man? because his track record of promotions may mean we've got a slightly better chance of signing some decent players in the summer and keeping our best ones. obviously this is assuming bates and harvey don't completely pull the rug from under his negotiations and support him a bit in the summer.


This
B-N-L
BARE-NAKED-LADY
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby BARE-NAKED-LADY » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:31 am

Man Called Sun wrote:
Top Cat Cooper wrote:SG's career was as a CB yet he has failed in three years to sort out the defence, not 9 games 3 years

I'm reluctant to wade in on this one but in Grayson's first year and a bit (ie in L1), this is exactly what he did do. It was only last season, at the start of which we'd have all been happy with mid-table, did we threaten to become a Keegan-era Newcastle. We also expected to score fuck all without Beckford, yet were among the top scorers in the division, having a fucking whale of a time in the process. All with the same robbing bastard behind the desk as we do now.


True, but I think that (defence) had more to do with the fact that Beckford left. Grayson had to change the way we played and other teams adapted to that because they didn't have to worry about Beckford's pace.
B-N-L
BARE-NAKED-LADY
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby moscowhite » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:10 pm

BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:As for him tearing a strip off Thompson in public, I must be the only one who thinks that he didn't. I think he said something along the lines of "You were a bit rash lad, it was a stupid tackle, but you'll learn from this, now get yourself in the shower and back out here..." Something along those lines anyway....


I thought it was a supportive word at first too. But that illusion is kind of shattered when you see Big Nose's face as it emerges from being Thompson. Enjoy it again by viewing this animated gif.

It seemed a bit like an old dad telling off a teenager (which in a way, it was) - "Go to your room!" - "I'm trying to! You're in my way!" - "You bet I'm in your way! Do you know how much trouble you're in?" - "Yes!" - "Don't take that tone with me!" - "What? I'm agreeing with you! Let me go!"
'If you give Leeds the ball, they will make you dance.' - Johan Cruyff
User avatar
moscowhite
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby BARE-NAKED-LADY » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:38 pm

moscowhite wrote:
BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:As for him tearing a strip off Thompson in public, I must be the only one who thinks that he didn't. I think he said something along the lines of "You were a bit rash lad, it was a stupid tackle, but you'll learn from this, now get yourself in the shower and back out here..." Something along those lines anyway....


I thought it was a supportive word at first too. But that illusion is kind of shattered when you see Big Nose's face as it emerges from being Thompson. Enjoy it again by viewing this animated gif.

It seemed a bit like an old dad telling off a teenager (which in a way, it was) - "Go to your room!" - "I'm trying to! You're in my way!" - "You bet I'm in your way! Do you know how much trouble you're in?" - "Yes!" - "Don't take that tone with me!" - "What? I'm agreeing with you! Let me go!"


Aye, you maybe right. When it's slowed down like that it looks different. It does look like though that he was so embarrassed and disappointed that he just wanted to get down the tunnel as quickly as possible.
B-N-L
BARE-NAKED-LADY
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby LSD&2Es » Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:27 pm

My take on Colins words with Zac were more that they were a kind of "those cunts got you sent off, don't worry about it".

Warnock's not the type to bollock a player in plain sight unless they're being a cunt, is he?
The Chief: "trust me, you can't have too many years with a club like Leeds."

Get a FREE GiffGaff SIM card and £5 Credit

Always have your stuff when you need it with @Dropbox. Sign up for free!
User avatar
LSD&2Es
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Surrey

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby AndyPaul » Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:46 pm

LSD&2Es wrote:My take on Colins words with Zac were more that they were a kind of "those cunts got you sent off, don't worry about it".

Warnock's not the type to bollock a player in plain sight unless they're being a cunt, is he?


I am still swaying towards this opinion too, its just Warnock looks like an ugly, snarling cunt even when he's being nice.
User avatar
AndyPaul
 
Posts: 5526
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:27 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby LSD&2Es » Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:16 pm

AndyPaul wrote:
LSD&2Es wrote:My take on Colins words with Zac were more that they were a kind of "those cunts got you sent off, don't worry about it".

Warnock's not the type to bollock a player in plain sight unless they're being a cunt, is he?


I am still swaying towards this opinion too, its just Warnock looks like an ugly, snarling cunt even when he's being nice.


I think he was wound up and somewhat aggrieved at the decision and that came across when he spoke to Zac on the line
The Chief: "trust me, you can't have too many years with a club like Leeds."

Get a FREE GiffGaff SIM card and £5 Credit

Always have your stuff when you need it with @Dropbox. Sign up for free!
User avatar
LSD&2Es
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Surrey

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby Quiffy » Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:16 pm

who gives a fuck if he's being nice to Zac? sometimes people need bollocking, sometimes being angry is right.
User avatar
Quiffy
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:56 pm

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby Mustafaster » Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:19 pm

This Pigeon Detectives gig sounds like a winner. :thumbl:
I was correct!
User avatar
Mustafaster
 
Posts: 4644
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 am
Location: PC Brigade House.

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby gazurtoids » Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:25 am

Image
User avatar
gazurtoids
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:10 am

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby gazurtoids » Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:27 am

Looking back [not looked at h.i.n for a while], I see that tagline isn't actually new...
User avatar
gazurtoids
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:10 am

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby Mindo » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:35 am

Apparently Brown broke Karacan's ankle: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17663619

Amazing that Pugh didnt get there first
I'll take you out for a meal with Mr and Mrs. Pain, order up some violent quiche
Mindo
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Redditch

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby Phil LUFC » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:33 pm

Mindo wrote:Apparently Brown broke Karacan's ankle: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17663619

Amazing that Pugh didnt get there first


Thats 2 players who's season he's ended then, following on from Butterfield when we played Barnsley.
User avatar
Phil LUFC
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: Scunthorpe

Re: We're gonna be Eggstra Royally fucked today Cyberkop

Postby the flying pig » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:51 pm

horrible little player, 'browny'.

dirty rather than 'hard' IMO. he was a goalscoring midfelder for the blunts, the whole reinvention as an 'enforcer' or whatever only seemed to come later in his career, i guess due to ageing & trying to cut it at a higher level than in his sheff utd days.
User avatar
the flying pig
 
Posts: 8629
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:24 am

Previous

Return to The Square Ball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests