What Ken Said – 04.01.12 – Food For Thought

Taken from Yorkshire Radio’s interview with Leeds United owner Ken Bates today (although his comments on the Burnley match suggests it was recorded yesterday)…

‘Mr Chairman’ speaks to Ben Fry about the Burnley match and the recent run of three defeats in a row. He talks about the Arsenal match, the injuries to Robert Snodgrass and Jonny Howson as well as the “big crowd” at the Burnley game (which at 27,295 is four fans less than last season’s average). He speaks about the January transfer window, including the arrivals of Andros Townsend and permanent signing of Danny Pugh. He looks forward to the New Year and at our place in the Championship table before reminding us how amazing the food is at Elland Road.

Ben Fry:  You’ve said a few times that being a chairman can raise the heart rate. I suppose the Burnley game is the perfect example.

Ken Bates: Well I think it is but I may have had a raised heart rate for the Derby game and the Barnsley game. Perhaps the least said, the soonest mended. Certainly Burnley was going to be a difficult one. They have been coming back. They were unlucky the last time and they have been coming back to their old form, Burnley. So to beat them with two new players in the side, I know Zac’s played once before but he’s a young man coming in and of course Townsend, who we are very appreciative of Spurs lending him to us for the rest of the season, and they needed time to bed down. It was a great result and a great demonstration of the fact that we’r slowly getting our act together with new players.

BF: A backs to the wall performance from Burnley once they had a man sent off. You think that’s going to give you a big advantage but sometimes playing against 10 can be hard work can’t it?

KB: It can. I can remember a number of times when 10 men have won. It’s amazing. Sometimes 11 men start playing about a bit and thinking they’ve got more time on the ball and they’re a bit too casual and over confident. And of course the 10 men play out of their skin. In their case, they thought their right-back had probably been wrongfully dismissed anyway. As Simon said to me this morning, we’ve had those situations elsewhere and so we’re happy to take it when it’s on our favour for a change.

BF: Off the back of the three defeats, how important was that result to start going back in the right direction as far as table was concerned?

KB: Well every result is important. Well every positive result is important. It needed to stop the rot, otherwise players start getting a mindset and as we’ve seen, take Newcastle’s result on Sunday, they had started so well and now they can’t buy a goal. It’s very important that we can now wave goodbye to 2011 and look forward to 2012 in a good frame of mind. We don’t have another league game for a fortnight’s time so this will enable us to sit down and consolidate what we did yesterday. I’m aware we’ve got a game against Arsenal but that’s a cup match, we’re the rank outsiders as we were of course against Manchester United so the players won’t feel under any pressure, they’re just go out basically have a good time and enjoy themselves and hopefully, as a result of that, catch Arsenal on the hop a bit, who of course are being cursed with injuries at the moment.

BF: If you could have a repeat of last year and have a repeat at Elland Road, that would be the best result all-round wouldn’t it?

KB: Well I’m not so sure because OK, the money’s also welcome, but I’d rather us concentrate on the league. Other than that it would give us fixture congestion and it would also put more strain on the players when at the time we are a bit on the weak side because of injuries. So if we only have Arsenal, Palace and Ipswich in January that gives some of our depleted forces some time to recover an recoup.

BF: Talking of injuries, I believe you have spoken to Robert Snodgrass and he’s on the road to recovery.

KB: Yeah, we gave Snoddy a ring yesterday to see how he was. Not very nice being home on your own when you’re a gregarious type of fella in a gregarious type of working situation, you know? So it was nice talking to him. He was saying how well his daughter is settling in at school in Leeds which is nice for him. He had keyhole surgery, which is much easier than when I had it a few years ago. So all he has got to do now is just let the wounds heal so he doesn’t tear them when he starts playing. But he’s as fit as a fiddle and bored out of his mind, not that his wife wants to hear that, of course. He’s looking very much to getting back playing.

BF: Going back to the game against burnley and a big crowd on the day. You must be pleased with the first attendance of 2012?

KB I was delighted. It was bigger than anything else in the Championship (TSB – except West Ham’s 34,936) or quite a few in the Premiership. It just goes to show that we have great support, there is no doubt.

BF: You touched on the impact Andros Townsend made and the fact that you’re grateful to Spurs for loaning him until the end of the season. Do you feel a player like that with some direct running was something that’s been missing for the last couple of weeks?

KB: Well the short answer to that question is yes because nobody has satisfactorily replaced Max Gradel. He said the other day he wants to come back but that’s another story. I don’t suppose his team will let him go now. It’s something different and Snoddy has been providing that of course but he has been a bit flat lately and now we know why. I think that Townsend will give us something that is unexpected that defenders won’t quite know how to handle him and hopefully by the time they have worked out how to mark him, he would have had an impact on the match.

BF: He won’t be the last addition in January but there’s no rush now with that Palace game a couple of weeks away. 

KB: Well I think it’s important, and let me get one thing… whoever we sign in January, whether it’s purchase or loan, we’ve got to get it right because it has to take us through until the end of the season and hopefully the play-offs and hopefully win us promotion. There will be a lot of panic buying, if you know what I mean, in the early part January, particularly by clubs that aren’t doing very well and some of the good players who are trying to go, their clubs will not let them out at first because of the possibility of selling them because they’re surplus to requirements. The other problem we have of course is when you’re buying players, particularly from the Premiership, it’s just their wages. We simply can’t afford what they are getting paid in the Premiership so therefore the lending club has to do a compromise and pay part of the wages. We were offered somebody last week, who said he was on £35,000 a week but his club said ‘we’ll make make a contribution to it’. I said ‘yes, how about £30,000?’ which of course we had a good laugh about and left it at that. But that is one of the problems. And what you sometimes find now is that the agents then chip in and then having agreed a deal with the club, the agent then tries to get extra deals for his player outside the club and that can be regarded as dodgy.  But the other trouble is there is some players who think they are worth a lot more than they are. The other problem you have is if players aren’t playing regularly, you don’t want to sign them and find out they need a month to get fit because they haven’t been playing any matches. That’s one of the problems we have. It’s what makes a management team’s job difficult. As I said before, there’s no point in signing anybody for the sake of signing anybody. We have already got 29 senior professionals or two less now because we’ve sent Keogh and McCarthy back but it’s still 27. A lot of clubs, even Premiership clubs, play with 23. If you have too many plays you struggle to keep them happy. You can’t. That then starts creating discontent and it gets into the dressing room and it spread like a virus throughout the whole club. So it’s a matter of balance and so as you said, it’s a long answer to a short question you asked, and that is the fact that we’ve got a fortnight before our next league game means we can think carefully and not rush it.

BF: One deal that has gone through is Danny Pugh’s loan deal which has been made permanent. A two-and-a-half-year contract. His versatility could prove vital particularly when the team has got a few injuries. 

KB: Yeah well he’s done a good job for us. I still don’t know why Kevin Blackwell let him go. Mind you he let Keogh go as well. He’s good, he’s fast, he’s industrious and of course he’s versatile. He can play left-back or left side of midfield or if necessary central midfield. He’s a good buy. Blackwell sold him for £50,000 and now we’ve paid a lot more to get him back but that’s the deal. That was the deal when we signed him. We’ve done it. Danny is now part of our regular squad which answers the question “Where’s the money gone?”. The answer is it has gone on players. Wages and transfer fees or both.

BF: Now we started 2012 with that win against Burnley. Are you feeling positive as we go into the New Year?

KB: Well I ink that one of the encouraging things is we have been extremely lucky during our bad spell because all the clubs around us have had bad spells. I mean, Southampton, who looked impregnable, we’re only nine points behind them and the same with West Ham, they’ve had a rocky spell. Middlesbough have been sweeping up the table and they’ve had a couple of bad results. I think they have picked up one point from the last six. So, you have got this each club knocking each other out again syndrome. What has happened is the clubs below us have caught up a little bit. The fact of the matter is, as we speak, we’re one point behind sixth place and fifth place for that matter as well. So if we’ve got this lapse out of the way and the players are geared up, the injuries are coming back and getting fitter, pity about Jonny Howson, we still don’t know whether he’ll be back sometime in February or the beginning of March. We’re looking good.

BF: You touched on Christmas period on the pitch but off the pitch it has been another successful year and of course a big part of what the club is trying to do. 

KB: Well as I’ve said in my programme notes, some fans are saying why do we bother with off-field activities. The answer is, we can’t make a living by gate receipts alone. Our gate receipts barely pay the players’ wages and first-team costs. So everything else has to come from other solutions. Fortunately, our conference and banqueting have had a tremendous season. I mean it’s very difficult out there as everybody knows. To have done over 10,000 silver-service meals in all the venues that we have over the festive season is quite amazing. Big thing in fact is that the quality of the food is so good. I mean I would say that wouldn’t I. Suzannah and I, if we were on our own, just as we were at Christmas, we would go to a hotel or restaurant. And believe you and me, the food we have had in the last three years at the Pavilion and the old conference and exhibition centre is absolutely fantastic. It’s proved by the number of people who are coming back all the time and all the other bookings. We’re building a very important business there that doesn’t depend on whether Billy Bloggs missed an open goal. And our merchandising is good as well. They had a good season, despite problems on the high street. Leeds United Merchandising is performing incredibly well.

28 Responses to What Ken Said – 04.01.12 – Food For Thought

  1. COL says:

    Bates claims “10,000 silver-service meals sold in the conferece and banqueting areas”. Who give a fuck? If the corporate side of the business is booming then why don’t you invest a bit in the team?

    • Danny Bowden says:

      You should as a Leeds supporter, it’s all money for the club. Was your new year’s resolution to be a sap?

      • Tom says:

        COL is right. It’s useless taking in money for the club if it isn’t going to be reinvested. I’m afraid to break it to you but its money for Ken Bates wallet, not the club.

      • Bob says:

        I was one of those meals….got married at Elland Road….cost a fortune but might have paid a player for the week….the day was top drawer and although it pains me Bates is right, the food is quality!

      • kane baker says:

        are you stupid? the money goes to the south of france and kens property portfolio.

    • Col says:

      Wale up, you idiot! If the corporate side benefited the club then I would be happy but we all know that anything Bates does is done purely to benefit Ken Bates. That said, it’s awfully nice of uncle Ken to spend £7m redeveloping a ground that he doesn’t own!

      • Cal says:

        Bates DOES own the ground. Its held in a caymans island or similar trust just like how he ownes the club. He never mentions it, because he would sell it seperately to some rich arab if he ever sold the club. The only thing he doesnt own is the training ground.

      • Danny Bowden says:

        It has to pay for itself first, then, and only then, will profit be made. At that point, if we don’t see any investment, I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong. We are not at that point yet, but what is certain is that without these other corporate avenues of revenue, we would have even less money.

        It’s easier to be frustrated than patient, but that’s no excuse for dealing in assumptions and heresay as opposed to facts.

  2. Paul D says:

    Oh well thats good then, the team may be huffing and puffing its way to mid-table but leeds united merchandising f.c are on fire!!

    Oh yeah, and another thing, his names paynter not bloggs you old giffer!!

    • Danny Bowden says:

      Huffing and puffing it’s way to within 9 points of the top of the league without hitting our stride. FFS, c’mon you morbid f**kers, stop chipping away at the team you allegedly support. If you really have to have a go at someone to get a buzz, how about you round on that c**t George Osborne who is raping our country for all it’s worth whilst smirking in our collective faces.

      • Danny Bowden says:

        PS: I hope you’re not my Dad, that’d be a bit awkward.

        • Paul D says:

          As much as I loathe Kenneth I genuinely thought I was being light hearted there, obviously not…

          Thanks for clarifying my moron status though, its always nice to get a second opinion. In return I can happily clarify that I am not your father, although I’m sure hes very proud.

          • Danny Bowden says:

            Hahaha.. Sorry for being personal.

            Whilst you’re frustrated at our position of 8th in the league, I am frustrated that our ‘supporters’ don’t seem to have learned from what happened under Peter Ridsdale. The world is a very different place to what is was then, and I for one, don’t want to have to wake up one day and see Leeds United on the edge of the abyss again.

      • kane baker says:

        labour to##er probably on benefits

        • Danny Bowden says:

          Yes, I was made redundant last year, like a couple of million other people, due to a few very, very, very rich, immoral criminals ruining the ‘world’s’ economy. I hope that makes you feel good.

          Any ‘benefits’ I receive go straight back into our economy, so it effectively doesn’t cost our country anything. Whilst selling all our gold reserves, putting our pensions into specualtive, disappearing hedge funds has meant our economy has flatlined; who’s the tosser!?!

          Oh, and i’m a socialist, not affiliated to any of the three main parties.

          Sleep well.

  3. Danny Bowden says:

    The most positive interview I have ever read with Ken Bates. I have to say, there is nothing in this interview which makes me concerned and that feels refreshingly good. As some of you may have seen in my posts recently on various Leeds sites, I have never been a great fan of Ken Bates, but more of the same and the doubters like myself and the morons above ; ) may be made to eat a huge slice of humble pie; please note I said ‘may’, though I will gladly gorge on that pie if we’re top 6 come the end of the season. I think Ken must’ve got his naggings this Christmas!

    • Tom says:

      You’re comments are completely and utterly ridiculus and you seem to have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Whether you like Ken Bates or not, this interview is not a sudden change of tone from the man, and I don’t think anybody will be eating a ‘huge slice of humble pie’. Have you been to any of the recent games? The performances have been dire, the atmosphere has been awful, and there is a mass of negativity around the club. I don’t think its that we haven’t hit our stride yet, you need to look at the bigger picture.

      • Danny Bowden says:

        Our form has been crap.

        The atmosphere is the worst I ever remember it being.

        There is a mass of negativity surroundiing our club.

        I completely agree, and nowhere have I said anything on the contrary.

        I was making a comment on how I responded to this one, and only, interview. I don’t like Ken Bates, I hate Peter Ridsdale, I love Leeds United.

        Putting words into my mouth and choosing to ignore the words I wrote achieves what exactly?

  4. lorimerhotshot says:

    10,000 silver service over the ‘festive period’ is what? Generous £500,000 at a non-bargain £50 a head?

    What cost lost ticket sales week in week out, financially, on the field, and in terms of long-term support?

    Norwich, where I now live, is not famous footballing country. But the club has really cheap concessions for kids, and are packed out every week, and were close to it last season. Many of those kids will grow up going to matches

    The ground only holds 27,200 but it’s always full (ave 26,500). The population of Norwich is about 130,000.

    And so to Leeds, glorious history, single club city, population 700-750,000(?), ER capacity effectively 40,000

    How many above the current 23,000 or so do you think we’d have with a flat fiver for under 15s and the same for pensioners?
    The much bigger crowds wouldn’t just come from the cheaper tickets – you can guarantee that season ticket sales would jump too, for fear of losing tickets on the day to the pesky blighters who only pay a fiver.

    What would you rather have, 35-40,000 at ER, even if not that much more gate money but still contributing to success of the team, or someone else’s dinner on a plate?

    I’m sure Bates has his sums right, but right for whom? Could it be that the sauce (!) of the income matters, and it’s easier to clean a plate than a gate?

  5. King of the Slums says:

    I try to hate him, I really do, but sorry to say it, I quite like the old scrote.

    All chairman’s take their cut, they’re never in it for the football, at least with Ken we’ve got a wily businessman and one you can have some banter with.

  6. Jacccqqques says:

    “Danny is now part of our regular squad which answers the question “Where’s the money gone?”. The answer is it has gone on players. Wages and transfer fees or both.”

    If all that was in Simons pot was enough to sign Danny Pugh and a loanee that will mostly be funded by his parent club then the money has gone somewhere else Mr Chairman!

    It’s quite worrying in his monologue about signings that he mentions that clubs won’t let players go early in the window as they think that they may be able to sell them instead. What does that tell you about our ambition during this window?

  7. normangunston says:

    Ken again counting loans out and in to boost his squad figure to 27.

    So are we paying all of O’Dea and Townsend’s wages? While also paying Taylor and Rachubka’s as well? That sounds like phenomenally bad financial management Ken.

  8. White van man says:

    What uncle Ken forgets to tell you is that the other income from meals , merchandise e,t,c. are all seperate companys owned by guess who.

  9. Lee says:

    “We have already got 29 senior professionals or two less now because we’ve sent Keogh and McCarthy back but it’s still 27. A lot of clubs, even Premiership clubs, play with 23.”

    Just for clarity here are the number of players at Premier League clubs (according to Soccerbase.com)

    35 Man City
    38 SCUM
    40 Tottenham
    31 Chelsea
    41 Arsenal
    30 Liverpool
    29 Newcastle
    32 Stoke
    28 Norwich
    30 Sunderland
    28 Everton
    33 Swansea
    29 Aston Villa
    31 Fulham
    30 West Brom
    30 Wolves
    35 QPR
    26 Wigan
    32 Blackburn
    35 Bolton

    27 LUFC

  10. FreePint says:

    Bates commenting on January transfer window: – ” . . we’ve got to get it right because it has to take us through until the end of the season and hopefully the play-offs and hopefully win us promotion”. How depressing is that? Our once great club reduced to “hoping” for a play-off place.

    When Bates arrived on 21 Jan 2005 we were 14th in the Championship – Almost exactly 7 Years later we’re 8th in the Championship – That’s not very impressive progress in my book.

    We’re currently the 28th best team in England but on the bright side we’ve got the Radebe Suite, Billy’s Bar, Howard’s restaraunt, the new Pavillion, the fantastic East Stand facilities and let’s not forget the exciting plans for the Lowfields Road development & a shiny new hotel. We also managed to screw the unlucky Creditors (businesses that dealt with us in good faith) for £35m so, in theory, we’re currently debt free. Well done Ken – Pity about the crap football team.

  11. joe says:

    its a fucking football club kenneth, not a restaurant.

  12. FreePint says:

    Bates is ‘turning a blind eye’ to attendances which are already 4,000 down on last season’s average – I expect that situation to get slowly worse. That’s nearly £2m in lost revenue (based on an average ticket price of around £20). How much more revenue do we lose on programme sales, merchandising, food & drink sales? Bates will start panicking soon & probably axe Grayson, rush into appointing a new guy and maybe release £1m from the mythical transfer ‘pot’ to try to satisfy the fans. In the long run, however, Bates will revert to type & the new manager will have to resort to shopping at Netto just like Grayson did – Good luck pal, whoever you may be.

  13. Zehring says:

    Good – I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs as well as related info ended up being truly easy to do to access. Zehring http://www.newsday.co.zw/2012/11/27/harare-city-council-probes-senior-staff/

Leave a reply